Why assume that equality is desirable? It is not enough, he contends, to advocate it as a mere aesthetic preference. Quite the contrary, equalitarians, like everyone else, need rationally to justify their ethical mandates. But this at once raises a deeper issue. How can ethical premises be justified? How do we get beyond bare appeals to moral intuition? Our author answers that correct ethics must be in accord with human nature.
When egalitarianism is measured by this commonsense criterion, the results are devastating. Everywhere in nature we find inequality. Attempts to remake human beings so that everyone fits the same mold lead inevitably to tyranny.
The great fact of individual difference and variability (that is, inequality) is evident from the long record of human experience; hence the general recognition of the antihuman nature of a world of coerced uniformity”
A foundamental reason and grounding for liberty, are the ineluctable of HUMAN BIOLOGY. In particular the fact that each individual IS a unique person, in many ways different from all others. If individual diversity were not the universal rule, then argument for liberty would be weak indeed. For if individuals were interchangeable hands, why should anyone worry about maximizing the opportunity for every person to DEVELOP HIS MIND and HIS FACULTIES, and his personality to the fullest extent possible?”
Oppure leggi il saggio”Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature” nel PDF online
Questa e’ una delle fondamentali verita’ scientifiche e antropologiche che dimostrano l’inesattezza dei postulati insiti nelle ‘soluzioni’ proposte e imposte dal marxismo. Il saggio spiega bene le motivazioni alla base dei fallimenti di questa ideologia e il perche’, partendo da assunti sbagliati sulla natura umana, e’ destinata sempre al conseguimento dello stesso risultato: la sconfitta.